New Delhi: ‘2016 demonetisation is valid’, Supreme court gives verdict on note ban. Justice B R Gavai says Centre’s decision-making process cannot be flawed as there was consultation between RBI and govt. SC dismisses batch of pleas challenging Centre’s 2016 decision on demonetisation, upholds move. Notification dated November 8, 2016 valid, satisfies test of proportionality, Supreme Court said. “Not relevant whether objective achieved or not,” Justice B R Gavai of Supreme Court on demonetisation. The Supreme Court has pronounced its judgment today on a batch of pleas challenging the government’s 2016 decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 denominations. A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice S A Nazeer, who will retire on January 4, has pronounced its verdict on the matter on January 2, when the top court will reopened after its winter break.

According to Monday’s cause list of the top court, there were two separate judgements in the matter, which will be pronounced by Justices B R Gavai and B V Nagarathna. Besides Justices Nazeer, Gavai and Nagarathna, the other members of the five-judge bench are Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian. The top court had, on December 7, directed the Centre and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to put on record the relevant records relating to the government’s 2016 decision and reserved its verdict.

It heard the arguments of Attorney General R Venkataramani, the RBI’s counsel and the petitioners’ lawyers, including senior advocates P Chidambaram and Shyam Divan.

Calling the scrapping of the Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes deeply flawed, Chidambaram had argued that the government cannot on its own initiate any proposal relating to legal tender, which can only be done on the recommendation of the RBI’s central board.